Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  216 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 216 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

long-term exchanges (about one to three years) for

immersion in the working of foreign nuclear safety and

radiation protection regulators. Whenever possible,

this type of exchange should be reciprocal.

For many years, ASN and the ONR (Office for Nuclear

Regulation –UnitedKingdom) have engaged in long-term

staff exchanges. Since June 2014, anASNstaff member has

been seconded toONR, to join the Sellafield programme

for a three-year period. This programme is one with

major implications for the ONR in the coming years, in

some respects very similar to those being encountered in

France with the fuel reprocessing facilities (for example

La Hague).

AnASNengineer has been seconded to the Spanish safety

regulator (CSN –

Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear)

since

February 2014, working in the division responsible for

radiological emergencies.

In August 2013, the secondment of an ASN staff member

to the American safety regulator began for a period of

three years. He is more specifically working in the field

of Social, Human and Organisational Factors (SOHF).

Since the beginning of March  2015, ASNhas also hosted

a member of the NRC for a period of one year. This

NRC representative is working in the Nuclear Power

plant Department (DCN) on drafting inspection guides,

more specifically with regard to the flooding risk. At the

beginning of 2016, another NRC representative joined

the DCN in place of his colleague.

Staff exchanges are also organised with international

organisations. For instance, a member of ASN has been

working at IAEA since autumn 2010, in the team tasked

with organising Integrated Regulatory Review Service

(IRRS) assignments. Finally, ASN is seconding two of its

staff to NEA, on the one hand to contribute to the work

of the MDEP technical secretariat and, on the other, to

assist the Safety Department.

These staff exchanges or secondments are a means of

enhancing ASNpractices. Experience acquired overmore

than ten years now indicates that inspector exchange

programmesmake a significant contribution to stimulating

bilateral relations between nuclear safety and radiation

protection regulators.

It is also worth underlining the appointment of

representatives of foreign safety regulatory bodies to the

Advisory Committees of Experts. ASN has adopted this

practice, which enables experts fromother countries not

only to take part in these advisory committees, but also

occasionally to act as Chair or Deputy Chair.

5.2 Bilateral cooperation between

ASN and its foreign counterparts

Bilateral relations betweenASNand its foreign counterparts

are built around an approach that integrates nuclear

safety and radiation protection for each of the countries

with which ASNmaintains relations. The following can

be offered as examples:

South Africa

In 2015, active technical exchanges continued between

ASN and its South African counterpart, the National

Nuclear Regulator (NNR). The main exchanges covered

the question of steam generator renewal. The NNR

is preparing to examine the replacement file for the

steam generators in the Koeberg NPP and wishes to

draw on ASN’s experience in this field. Two technical

meetings were therefore held in France in 2015. The

first was in Lyon, to discuss the inspection process and

its implementation. The second took place in Dijon

in October, to examine the more technical aspects of

regulation.

Germany

The 41st French-German Commission for nuclear facility

safety issues

(Die Deutsche-Französische Kommission

für Fragen der Sicherheit kerntechnischer Einrichtungen

– DFK) was held in June 2015 in Cherbourg. This

annual meeting enabled the two delegations to present

topical matters related to nuclear safety and radiation

protection, as well as the annual reviews concerning

the safety of the Fessenheim and Cattenom NPPs in

France and Neckarwestheim and Philippsburg in

Germany. The representatives of the four thematic

working groups set up by the DFK also presented

their work. The decision was taken to terminate the

4th Working Group (WG) on small-scale nuclear

activities as its work was considered to duplicate that

carried out in multilateral forums such as HERCA.

The two delegations had the opportunity to visit the

EPR construction site at Flamanville.

Belgium

ASN enjoys long-standing and regular relations with

its Belgian counterpart, AFCN (Federal Agency for

Nuclear Regulation), and Bel V, its technical support

organisation, on a variety of subjects (power and research

reactors, cyclotrons, radiation protection in particular

in the medical field, radon, transport, etc.).

In addition to the periodic meetings on the safety

of nuclear facilities (two meetings per year) and

transport (one meeting per year), AFCN and ASN

are also continuing their exchange of experience of the

regulation of facilities such as the

Institut national des

Radioéléments (IRE)

in Belgium or CIS bio international

in France.

216

CHAPTER 07:

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015