Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  258 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 258 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

SET Georges Besse II - Uranium enrichment plant in Pierrelatte

The Georges Besse II (GB II) plant operated by

Société

d’enrichissement du Tricastin

(SET), displayed a satisfactory

level of safety in 2015. The technologies deployed in the

plant enable high standards of safety, radiation protection

and environmental protection to be met.

The gradual entry into production of the enrichment

cascades was completed in 2015. The internal cascade

startup authorisation commission functioned satisfactorily.

After an inspection carried out by ASN in 2014 to examine

the criticality riskwhich gave unsatisfactory results, ASN

verified in 2015 that SET had takenmeasures to improve

control of the criticality risk.

ASN also authorised entry into service of the REC II unit

through ASN resolution 2014-DC-0461 of 7th October

2014. In 2015 it verified the conditions of entry into

service of this facility. Although the first operations of

the unit were carried out with rigour, ASN considers that

the operating reliability of the facilitymust be improved.

Socatri - Company operating

a clean-up and recovery installation - Bollène plant

ASN detected shortcomings in the management of the

operational safety of Socrati’s activities in 2015.

With regard to the commitments made by Socatri in

2014 following the periodic safety review of BNI 138,

ASN observed that the licensee had difficulties in

meeting the commitment deadlines and content, and

then in deploying them operationally, particularly the

commitments concerning control of the criticality risk.

ASN also detected several nonconformities of elements

classified as important for protection with respect to

the defined design requirements. Lastly, numerous

shortcomings in fire risk control were detected during

an unannounced inspection on this theme in 2015.

ASN therefore expects Socatri to demonstrate greater

operating rigour and improve the facility’s compliance

with its baseline safety requirements.

Installations undergoing decommissioning

Superphénix reactor at Creys-Malville

ASN considers that the safety of the Superphénix reactor

decommissioning operations and of operation of the

APEC (fuel storage facility) is ensured satisfactorily. The

progress ASNobserved in 2014with regard to operating

rigour andmonitoring the performance of maintenance

operations and periodic tests was maintained in 2015.

In 2015 ASN asked EDF to rapidly take organisational

measures to improve management of the retention

structures and in particular the treatment of hazardous

substances that could accumulate in them.

ASNwill shortlymake a statement on the treatment of the

residual sodium of the reactor vessel and its filling with

water. Preparation and performance of these operations

represent the main risk activities for the coming year.

The periodic safety review has started on the site’s two

installations. EDF must submit the conclusions to ASN

in March  2016. After examining them, ASN will adopt

a position on the conditions of its continued operation.

Bugey nuclear power plant reactor 1 undergoing decommissioning

ASN considers that the decommissioning of reactor 1 is

proceeding under generally satisfactory safety conditions

but that EDF must remain vigilant to the safety of the

workers performing the activities.

The decommissioning work outside the reactor vessel

continued in 2015.

CEA centre reactors and plants in Grenoble

Particularly notable in 2015 was the finalising of the

operations to clean-out and delicense the waste zoning

of the LAMA (activematerials analysis laboratory), which

took place in February. CEA submitted its delicensing

application file for the BNI in March 2015.

The technical discussions between ASN and the CEA

concerning the remediation of the soil of the STED (effluent

and waste treatment plant) continued. ASN asked the

CEA to continue the remediation operations that can be

technically achieved at a cost that remains acceptable.

The other industrial and research facilities

High Flux Reactor (RHF) in the Laue-Langevin Institute (ILL)

in Grenoble

ASN considers that the safety of the RHF is managed

in a responsive and determined manner in the areas

considered as priorities by ILL.

Thus, in response to the lessons learned fromtheFukushima

Daiichi accident, ILL rapidly introduced substantial

consolidation measures, which continued smoothly in

2015. ASN notes however that these improvements are

not always implemented with the rigour necessary to

ensure traceability of the activities and updating of the

baseline requirements.

Besides, the ILL must improve and clarify the baseline

safety requirements of the installation, then ensure that

the installation complies with this baseline.

LYON DIVISION

258

CHAPTER 08 :

REGIONAL OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION PROTECTION

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015