Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  414 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 414 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

1. THE FUEL CYCLE

The uranium ore is extracted, then purified and

concentrated into “yellow cake” on the mining sites.

The solid yellow cake is then converted into uranium

hexafluoride gas (UF

6

). This rawmaterial, whichwill be

subsequently enriched, ismade at the ArevaNCComurhex

plants in Malvési (which converts to UF

4

) and Tricastin

(which converts to UF

6

). The facilities in question –

most of which are regulated under the legislation for

Installations Classified on Environmental Protection

grounds (ICPEs) – use natural uranium in which the

uranium-235 content is around 0.7%.

Most of the world’s NPPs use uranium which is slightly

enriched in uranium-235. For example, the fleet of

Pressurised Water Reactors (PWR) requires uranium

enriched to between 3%and 5%with the U-235 isotope.

The gas centrifuge process used by theGB II plant replaced

the gaseous diffusion process, employed by the Eurodif

plant until June 2012.

The process used in the FBFC plant at Romans-sur-Isère

transforms the enrichedUF

6

into uraniumoxide powder.

The fuel pellets manufactured with this oxide are clad

to make fuel rods, which are then combined to form

fuel assemblies. These assemblies are then placed in the

reactor core where they release power by the fission of

uranium-235 nuclei.

After a period of use of about three to five years, the spent

fuel is removed from the reactor and cooled in a pool,

firstly on the site of the plant in which it was used and

then in the Areva NC reprocessing plant at La Hague.

At this plant, the uraniumand plutonium from the spent

fuels are separated fromthe fissionproducts and actinides

1

.

The uranium and plutonium are packaged and then

stored for subsequent re-use. However, at present, the

uranium obtained from reprocessing is no longer used

to produce new fuels. The radioactive waste produced

by these operations is disposed of in a surface repository

if it is low-level waste, otherwise it is placed in storage

2

pending a final disposal solution.

The plutonium resulting from the reprocessing of these

uranium oxide fuels is used in the Areva NC plant in

Marcoule, calledMélox, to fabricateMOX fuel (Mixture

of uraniumand plutoniumOXides) which ismainly used

in certain 900 MWe nuclear power reactors in France.

1. Actinides are chemical elements heavier than uranium.

2. Storage is temporary, while disposal is final.

T

he fuel cycle

begins with the extraction of uraniumore and ends with packaging

of the various radioactive wastes from the spent fuels so that they can be sent

for disposal. In France, all the uranium mines have been closed since 2000,

so the fuel cycle concerns the steps involved in the fabrication of the fuel and

then its reprocessing once it has been used in nuclear reactors.

Fuel cycle plants comprise all the facilities performing conversion, uranium enrichment,

design and fabrication of fuels for nuclear reactors, that is the front-end part of the cycle – in

other words before irradiation – as well as facilities for reprocessing spent fuel, that is the

back-end part of the cycle. These facilities utilise nuclear material, transformed into fuel,

based on uranium oxide or a mixture of uranium and plutonium oxides (called MOX), the

plutoniumhaving been generated by burn-up of the enriched natural uranium fuel in power

reactors and then extracted from the irradiated fuels during the reprocessing operations.

The main plants operating in the fuel cycle – Areva NC Tricastin (Comurhex and TU5/W),

Eurodif, Georges Besse II (GB II), Areva NP Romans-sur-Isère (ex-FBFC and ex-Cerca),

Mélox, Areva NC La Hague and Areva NC Malvési (which is an Installation Classified on

Environmental Protection grounds – ICPE) – are part of the Areva group (of which Areva NC

and Areva NP are subsidiaries). ASN regulates these industrial facilities and considers that

steps must be taken for all of the Group’s facilities in order to promote safety and radiation

protection coherently and allow the use of international best practices. ASN also monitors

the overall consistency of the fuel cycle in terms of safety and regulatory compliance. Areva

and EDF must in particular demonstrate that their industrial fuel management choices do

not compromise the safety of the facilities.

414

CHAPTER 13:

NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE INSTALLATIONS

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015