Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  83 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 83 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

The Working Group (WG) tasked with producing

the PNGMDR comprises environmental protection

associations, experts, representatives from industry

and regulatory authorities, alongside the radioactive

waste producers and managers. It is co-chaired by the

DGEC (General Directorate for Energy and the Climate)

of the Ministry for the Environment, Energy and the

Sea and by ASN.

The work of the PNGMDR WG is presented in greater

detail in chapter 16.

2.6.2 The Steering Committee for Managing

the Nuclear Post-Accident Phase

Pursuant to the Interministerial Directive of 7th April

2005, ASN, in associationwith theMinisterial departments

concerned, is responsible for defining, preparing and

implementing the steps necessary for managing a post-

accident situation.

In order to develop a doctrine and after testing post-

accident management during national and international

exercises, ASNbrought all the players concerned together

within the Codirpa (Steering Committee responsible for

Post-Accident Management). This committee, headed by

ASN, has representatives fromtheministerial departments

concerned, the health agencies, associations, the CLI,

and IRSN.

The work of the Codirpa is presented in greater detail

in chapter 5.

2.6.3 The Steering Committee for Social,

Organisational and Human Factors

ASN considers that there is a need to move forward with

regard to the reflections and work being done on the

human contribution and organisations to the safety of

nuclear facilities and in 2012 it therefore decided to set

up the Steering Committee for Social, Organisational

and Human Factors (COFSOH) (see box below). The

purpose of the COFSOH is on the one hand to allow

exchanges between stakeholders on such a difficult

subject as social, organisational and human factors and,

on the other, to draft documents proposing common

positions by the various members of the COFSOH on a

given subject, along with guidelines for future studies to

shed light on subjects that are insufficiently understood

or which are lacking in clarity.

2.6.4 The other pluralistic groups

In2015, the national committee responsible formonitoring

the national plan for management of radon risks, chaired

by ASN, carried out an assessment of the 2011-2015

national action plan and prepared the third plan for the

period 2016-2019 (see chapter 1).

2.7 Other stakeholders

As part of its mission to protect the general public from

the health risks of ionising radiation, ASN cooperates

closely with other competent institutional stakeholders

addressing health issues.

ASN has set up a Steering Committee for Social,

Organisational and Human Factors

Social, organisational and human factors received particular

attention during the stress tests further to the Fukushima

Daiichi accident. On completion of the various investigations,

ASN indicated in January 2012 that it had identified three

priorities in this area:

• renewal of the licensees’ workforce and skills;

• -organisation of the use of subcontracting;

• research on these topics, for which programmes

must be set up, at national or European levels.

Further to the stress tests, ASN has set up a pluralistic

working group on these subjects, called the COFSOH

(Steering Committee for Social, Organisational and Human

Factors). In addition to ASN members, this Committee

includes representatives of institutions and environmental

protection associations, personalities chosen for their

scientific, technical, economic, social, or information and

communication expertise, persons in charge of nuclear

activities, representatives of nuclear industry professional

federations and representative employees’ unions.

Nine plenary meetings of this Committee have been held

since 2012. They allowed discussion of the following topics:

subcontracting conditions and the relationship between client

and subcontractors, the interaction between “managed

safety” and “regulated safety”, skills management at a time

of workforce turnover and assessment of organisations or the

use of pertinent OHF indicators to assess safety.

Since the beginning of 2013 and in parallel with the plenary

meetings, the work of the COFSOH has been continuing

through four working groups. The forty meetings held to date

have addressed the following subjects:

• subcontracting in normal operating situations:

• management of emergency situations;

• interaction between managed safety and regulated safety;

• legal questions raised in connection with the subjects

addressed in the other three working groups.

UNDERSTAND

83

CHAPTER 02:

PRINCIPLES AND STAKEHOLDERS IN THE REGULATION OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION PROTECTION

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015