Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  234 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 234 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

ASN observes that, although the overall organisation

of the two reactor outages scheduled during 2015 was

generally satisfactory, deficiencies in work preparation,

in the quality of performance of maintenance work and

in the monitoring of outside contractors nevertheless

led to two significant incident situations. The first led

to the triggering of the on-site emergency plan further

to suspicion of a fire in a nuclear zone, which turned

out, after verification, to be unfounded. The second

led to the loss of the NPP’s external electrical power

supplies for more than two days, with the safety functions

nevertheless remaining fulfilled. ASN considers that the

site must ensure the quality and completeness of the

information transmitted, from the detection of such

events through to their closure.

With regard to radiation protection, the site has embraced

the Everest approach for entering the installation’s nuclear

zones in standard working overalls and ASN notes that

the radiological exposure of the workers was satisfactorily

controlled during the two reactor outages.

ASN considers that the organisation set up by the site

for environmental protection and waste management

enables the corresponding requirements to be satisfied

on the whole.

Paluel nuclear power plant

ASNconsiders that the nuclear safety, radiation protection

and environmental protection performance of the

Paluel NPP is, on the whole, in line with ASN’s general

assessment of EDF’s performance.

The site has confirmed its satisfactory performance in

operational management of the reactors. ASN notes

nevertheless that the error reduction techniques relative

to the preparation and retrospective verification of

the operating, radiation protection and maintenance

activities are insufficiently applied by the operators.

Cross-site corrective actions must be taken to remedy

this situation. ASNnotes an improvement – whichmust

be maintained over the long term – in the integration of

the analyses produced by the on-site EDF service tasked

with conducting an independent safety verification.

A highlight of 2015 was the first part of the 10-year

outage of reactor 2 which involved major maintenance

operations and systemmodifications aiming in particular

at improving the safety of the reactor. The condenser

was affected by a significant industrial fire in the non-

nuclear part of the installation. In addition, a lifting

beam intended for handling the steam generators fell

accidentally, without causing any injuries; ASN asked

that a third-party investigation be carried out on this

issue. With regard to nuclear safety, ASN considers

that the other work programmes were carried out

satisfactorily during the two reactor outages in 2015.

ASNdoes however note that increased rigour is necessary

in the use of air locks for certain operations involving

a contamination risk and that the analyses relating to

fire risks must fully meet the particularities of each

activity. ASN draws the site’s attention to the need to have

sufficient resources in 2016, particularly with regard

to the reactor outage programme, which includes two

simultaneous 10-year outages.

With regard to environmental protection, ASN considers

that the site must step up its organisation for ensuring

the management, servicing and maintenance of the

radioactive effluent storage tanks. In addition, the

file submitted by EDF to request modifications in the

site’s discharge prescriptions has been made available

for public consultation and its examination will be

continued in 2016.

Penly nuclear power plant

ASN considers that the nuclear safety and radiation

protection performance of the Penly site stands out

positively with respect to its overall assessment of EDF.

The site’s environmental protection performance is in

line with ASN’s general assessment of EDF.

With regard to nuclear safety, ASN considers that the

site maintains a satisfactory level in a context where

the volume of maintenance work remained low. ASN

considers that particular attention must be paid to the

preparation of the operational control activities in order

to step up implementation of error reduction techniques

when working on the equipment. The increase in the

number of limited-impact deviations reflects a lack of

rigour in application of the operating procedures.

CAEN DIVISION

ASN inspection at the Paluel NPP, November 2015.

234

CHAPTER 08 :

REGIONAL OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION PROTECTION

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015