Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  271 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 271 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

NANTES DIVISION

1. ASSESSMENT BY DOMAIN

1.1 The nuclear installations

The company Ionisos operates two industrial irradiation

facilities used chiefly for two applications: product

sterilisation (essentially medical equipment, and to a

lesser extent foodstuffs) and the treatment of plastic

materials to improve their mechanical characteristics.

Two inspections conducted in 2015 served to examine

compliance with the baseline safety requirements of the

installations in Pouzauges end Sablé-sur-Sarthe and assess

the progress in implementing the provisions of the Order

of 7th February 2012 setting the general rules for BNIs.

These inspections confirmed that the requestsmade during

the previous inspections concerning the verification of

the lifting devices and satisfactory performance of the

periodic tests for verifying operation of the safety systems

had been taken into account. The requirements of the

Order of 7th February 2012 seem to be well complied

with on the whole, even though improvements in the

monitoring of outside companies are to be planned for.

In June 2015, Ionisos submitted a periodic safety review

summary file for the irradiator in Sablé-sur-Sarthe, as

agreed. ASN requested IRSN’s opinion on this file, asking

it to examine more particularly the relevance of the

licensee’s proposed action plan and the corresponding

implementation schedule. This periodic safety review

will also be used to study the additional measures to

be put in place concerning accesses to the irradiation

cell, further to the incident of June 2009 involving the

untimely opening of the irradiation cell access door on

the Pouzauges site.

Ionisos will carry out the periodic safety review of the

Pouzauges site in 2017, whichmust integrate the lessons

identified by ASN during the examination of this safety

review.

1.2 Radiation protection

in the medical field

Radiotherapy

The technical and organisational changes (relocations,

groupings) undertaken by the radiotherapy centres in

the Bretagne and Pays de la Loire regions over the last few

years continue while preserving the regional meshing of

their locations is preserved. In this context, nine of the

fourteen radiotherapy centres in the Bretagne and Pays

de la Loire regions were inspected in 2015.

All the radiotherapy centres in these two regionsmeet the

criteria relative to the control of treatment planning and

delivery. The radiotherapy centres have also engaged in

a treatment quality and safety management process in a

generally similar and satisfactorymanner. The disparities

observed between the two regions until 2013 thus seem

corrected and today the centres are entering a phase of

consolidation and enrichment of their treatment quality

and safety management system. In this context, several

radiotherapy centres, particularly in Bretagne, have started

a process of inter-centre cross-audits supported by the

AFQSR (French Association for Quality and Safety in

Radiotherapy) created in 2013.

Nevertheless, themobilisation of the centresmust continue

their efforts to ensure that their documentation system,

the study of risks run by patients and the procedures for

stopping or continuing the treatments associated with

these new techniques are kept up to date overtime and

as technical and material development occur.

With regard to the identification and treatment of adverse

events, all the centres have tools for managing internal

reporting of adverse events andhave undertaken to conduct

new awareness-raising campaigns for their personnel on

these subjects. Their systems for managing and analysing

events that could arise during the radiotherapy treatment

process are also operational, but retrospective analyses of

events nevertheless remain brief and must still be taken

further in nearly 40% of the centres.

Finally, the efforts made in the last few years to recruit

medical physicists, dosimetrists andphysicalmeasurement

technicians enable all the centres to ensure the presence

of at least one medical physicist during the treatment

periods each day while freeingmedical radiation physics

time for the deployment of new treatment techniques.

Nonetheless, some centres occasionally had to review

their organisation in 2015 to ensure this presence due to

temporary and unforeseen vacancies inmedical physics

positions.

Interventional practices

A regional investigation carried out in 2013 with the

healthcare centres of the Bretagne and Pays de la Loire

regions providedmore detailedknowledge of interventional

practices (see chapter 9, point 1.1.2). ASNhas stepped up

its oversight actions since then: 21 centres were inspected

in 2015 compared with 16 in 2014 and nine in 2013.

The effort made in terms of inspection volumes and

prioritisation has also enabled the largest centres in the two

regions to be re-inspected and the tracking of identified

areas for progress to be tightened. It has resulted among

other things in significant improvement in the levels of

training in occupational and patient radiation protection.

On the other hand, for the other centres inspected,

the findings remain relatively similar to those of the

previous years, with occupational radiation protection

generally being better catered for than patient radiation

protection. In this latter domain, there is still much

room for improvement, whether in the presence and

271

CHAPTER 08 :

REGIONAL OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RADIATION PROTECTION

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015