Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  378 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 378 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

or periodic safety review of the installations. In order to

define this exceptional level earthquake, ASNasked EDF

to supplement the deterministic approach to defining the

seismic hazardwith a probabilistic approach, whichwould

be more closely in line with international best practices

(see point 3.1).

2.6.2 Drafting of flooding protection rules

The partial flooding of the Le Blayais NPP in December

1999 led the licensees, under the supervision of ASN,

to reassess the safety of the existing BNIs with respect

to this risk in more severe conditions than previously

and to make a number of safety improvements, with a

schedule proportionate to the potential consequences. In

accordance with the ASNprescriptions, EDF completed

the required work on the entire NPP fleet by the end

of 2014.

At the same time, to ensure more exhaustive and more

robust integration of the flooding risk, as of the facilities

design stage, ASN published Guide No. 13 in 2013

concerning BNI protection against external flooding.

For the existing facilities, ASN asked EDF in 2014 to

take account of the recommendations of the guide on

all its reactors during the course of the coming ten years

and no later than the last periodic safety review of the

reactors on a given site.

Following the stress tests performed in the wake of the

Fukushima Daiichi accident, ASN considered that, with

regard to protection against flooding, the requirements

arising from the complete reassessment performed after

the flooding of the Le Blayais NPP in 1999 provided the

nuclear power plantswith a high level of protection against

the risk of external flooding. However, in June 2012, ASN

issued several resolutions to ask the licensees:

to reinforceNPPprotectionagainst certainhazards, such

as intense rainfall and earthquake-induced flooding;

todefineandimplementa“hardenedsafetycore”ofmaterial

and organisational measures to control the fundamental

safety functions in extreme situations and in particular

in the case of flooding beyond the design-basis safety

requirements (see point 3.1).

2.6.3 Prevention of heat wave and drought risks

During the heat waves in recent decades, some of the rivers

used to cool NPPs experienced a reduction in their flow

rate and significant warming.

Significant temperature riseswere also observed in certain

NPP premises housing heat-sensitive equipment.

EDF took account of this experience feedback and initiated

reassessments of the operationof its facilities inair andwater

temperature conditionsmore extreme than those initially

included in the design. In parallel with development of

these “extreme heat” baseline safety requirements, EDF

initiated the deployment of priority modifications (such

as an increase in the capacity of certain heat exchangers)

and adopted operating practices optimising the cooling

capacity of the equipment and improving the resistance

of equipment susceptible to high temperatures.

In 2012, ASN approved the application of these

baseline requirements to the 900 MWe reactors as well

as implementation of the resulting modifications. ASN

also asked EDF to take account of the comments it made

during this examination process with a view to drafting

and implementing baseline requirements applicable to

the other plant series.

For the periodic safety reviewof the 1,300 MWe reactors,

EDFhas initiatedamodifications programme on its facilities

designed toprovideprotectionagainst heatwave situations.

The capacity of certain cooling systems for equipment

required for the nuclear safety case will in particular be

improved.

EDF has also initiated a monitoring programme in order

to anticipate climate changes, which could compromise

the hypotheses adopted in the “extreme heat” baseline

safety standards.

The impact on thermal discharges from the NPPs

NPPs discharge hot effluents into rivers or the sea,

either directly, from those NPPs operating with direct

or “once-through” cooling, or after cooling of these

effluents in cooling towers, enabling some of the heat

to be dissipated to the atmosphere. Thermal discharges

fromNPPs lead to a temperature rise between the points

upstream and downstream of the discharge which,

Floor anchoring of a pump.

378

CHAPTER 12:

EDF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (NPPs)

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015