Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  505 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 505 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

The studies submitted for the 2013-2015 PNGMDR,

based on ASN opinion 2012-AV-0168 of 11th October

2012, have provided greater insight into:

the strategy chosen for the changes in the treatment

of water collected from former mining sites;

a doctrine for assessing the long-term integrity of the

embankments surrounding the tailings disposal sites;

the comparison of the surveillance data and the results

of modelling to improve the relevance of the systems of

surveillance and evaluation of the long-termdosimetric

impact of the tailings disposal sites;

the evaluation of the long-term dosimetric impact of

the mining waste rock piles and the mining waste rock

in the public domain in relation to the results obtained

in the context of the Circular of 22nd July 2009;

transport of uranium from the waste rock piles to

the environment;

the mechanisms governing the mobility of uranium

and radiumwithin uranium-bearing mining tailings.

These various studies have to be continued under the

next two waste management plans, PNGMDR 2016-

2018 and 2019-2021, as requested in ASN opinion of

9th February 2016 in order to:

supplement the studies of the long-term evolution of

processing residues and mining waste rock;

supplement the method of evaluating the long-term

resistance of embankments;

study the possibilities of upgrading or shutting down

the water treatment stations and ultimately proposing

concrete risk- and impact-reduction actions on the

various sites.

With regard to mining waste rock, the treatment of sites

with uncovered waste rock must be continued. The

consultation process must also be continued with the

stakeholders on all these subjects, within the framework

of the PNMGDR as well as at the local level.

Long-term management of the former mining sites

ASN is contributing to a technical guide on the

management of former uranium mining sites that is

currently being prepared under the coordination of

the Ministry responsible for the Environment. It shall

more particularly respond to several recommendations

resulting from the report of the Limousin Pluralistic

Expert Group (GEP) of September 2010: it will address

the administrative status of the sites, the procedures for

stopping mining work and the requirements in terms

of redevelopment in the long-term perspective.

The Pluralistic Expert Group (GEP), the

involvement and informing of the stakeholders

Set up in2005, the LimousinPluralistic Expert Group (GEP)

submitted a first report containing its recommendations

for the short-, medium- and long-term management of

former uranium mining sites in France to the Minister

responsible for the Environment and to the Chairman

of ASN in September 2010. ASN and the Ministry

responsible for the Environment are thus engaged in a

plan of action dedicated to the implementation of these

recommendations.

A second report was submitted to the Minister in 2013;

it presents the results drawn from the presentation of

the GEP’s conclusions and recommendations to the local

and national consultative bodies and an evaluation of

the implementation of its recommendations. The GEP

considers its involvement to have brought positive results

and notes that its recommendations remain fully relevant.

ASN and the Ministry responsible for the Environment

have proposed the creation of a network of experts from

the sitemonitoring commissions whowould be assigned

expert appraisal missions on questions of both local and

national scope where justified by the societal aspect.

In 2014 ASN continued its involvement in the steering

committee for the national inventory of uraniummining

sitesMIMAUSA (Memory and impact of uraniummines:

summary and archives, available on

www.irsn.fr)

. This

mining site inventory was updated in summer 2013; it

provides access to all the environmental assessments

submitted by Areva on account of the Circular of 22nd July

2009. It will ultimately be supplemented by a mining

waste rock inventory.

2. MANAGEMENT OF SITES

AND SOILS CONTAMINATED

BY RADIOACTIVITY

A site contaminated by radioactive substances is defined

as any site, whether abandoned or in operation, onwhich

natural or artificial radioactive substances have been or

are employed or stored in conditions such that the site

may constitute a hazard for health and the environment.

Contamination by radioactive substances can be the result

of industrial, medical or research activities involving

radioactive substances. It can concern the places where

these activities are carried out, but also their immediate

or more remote vicinity. The activities concerned are

generally either “nuclear activities” as defined by the Public

HealthCode, or activities concerned by enhanced natural

radioactivity, as covered by the Order of 25thMay 2005.

However, most of the sites contaminated by radioactive

substances and today requiringmanagement in fact concern

past industrial activities, dating back to a time when

radioactive hazards were not perceived in the same way

as at present. Themain industrial sectors fromwhich the

radioactive contamination identified today originated are:

radium extraction for medical and para-pharmaceutical

needs, from the early 20th century up to the end of the

1930s; the manufacture and application of luminescent

radioactive paint for night vision and the industriesworking

505

CHAPTER 16:

RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND CONTAMINATED SITES AND SOILS

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015