Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  433 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 433 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

In addition, the changes to fuel management for power

reactors requiring adaptation of the characteristics of

the MOX fuel, will be a subject of interest for ASN.

Areva NC will be required to demonstrate that these

changes have no consequences for the safety of the

facility and, as necessary, will submit the necessary

modification files.

La Hague site

For the La Hague plants, ASN considers that efforts

must be continued for the recovery and packaging of

legacy waste on the site in order to meet the prescribed

deadlines. Within the framework of the periodic safety

reviews of the facilities, 2016 should see the continued

implementation of the process to identify the operational

Elements Important for Protection (EIP) and to improve

the general operating rules of these plants.

The UP2-800 plant periodic safety review report

submitted by Areva NC at the end of 2015 will be

completed during the course of 2016.

The review of the UP3-A plant revealed a phenomenon

of corrosion on the six R2 and T2 evaporators used to

concentrate the fission products remaining after extraction

of the plutonium and uranium from spent nuclear fuels

that was much faster than had been anticipated by

the licensee. The effects of this phenomenon on this

equipment are only partially understood by Areva. The

data transmitted to ASN on this subject at the end of

2015 led it to ask the licensee to present very rapidly the

measures it intends to take to limit the development of

the corrosion phenomenon, to obtain a reliable picture

of the condition of its equipment and to operate the

facility safely in the event of a containment breach. In any

case, ASN will issue a statutory resolution concerning

the operation of this equipment, which will need to

be replaced. ASN considers that replacement of this

equipment must be a priority for the licensee.

With regard to the forthcoming process changes in the

La Hague facility, ASN attaches particular importance to

two modifications: On the one hand, the TCP project

which will allow reprocessing of several particular fuel

assemblies and thus postpone saturation of the spent

fuel storage pools and, on the other, the replacement of

the R7 evaporator, for which the particularly corrosive

solutions are currently being concentrated in other

equipment in the plant and are liable to damage it.

ASN will also be vigilant in ensuring that all the

fuels received in the Areva NC plant are intended for

reprocessing in accordance with the plant’s authorization

decrees.

With regard to the recovery of legacy waste, ASNwill be

attentive to ensuring that any changes in Areva’s industrial

strategy do not lead to non-compliance with the ASN

prescriptions concerning the recovery and removal of

waste from silo 130 and the STE2 and HAO sludges.

ASN already issued prescriptions to this effect in 2010

for silo 130 and in 2014 for the RCD programme as a

whole. 2016 will thus be marked by ASN’s verification

of the licensee’s implementation of the above-mentioned

regulatory provisions.

433

CHAPTER 13:

NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE INSTALLATIONS

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015