Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  436 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 436 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

1. CEA INSTALLATIONS

The CEA centres comprise facilities devoted to research

(experimental reactors, laboratories, etc.) and their support

facilities (waste storage facilities, effluent treatment

stations, etc.). Research at CEA focuses on areas such

as the lifetime of power plants, future reactors, nuclear

fuel performance, or the reprocessing and packaging of

nuclear waste.

Point 1.1 below lists the generic subjects whichmarked

the year 2015. Point 1.2 describes topical events in the

various CEA installations currently operating. The CEA

facilities undergoing clean-out or decommissioning are

covered in chapter 15 and those devoted to themanagement

of waste and spent fuel are covered in chapter 16.

1.1 Generic subjects

Through inspection campaigns, analysis of the lessons

learned from operation of the facilities, or the review of

files, ASN identifies generic topics on which it questions

andmonitorsCEA.Generic subjects onwhichASNfocused

in 2015 were:

monitoring of periodic safety reviews, more specifically

to ensure that aspects common to the BNIs on a given site

are taken into account, alongwith experience feedback

from the additional information during examination

of the files for the CEA facilities with the lowest risks;

waste management (see chapter  16) and the

decommissioning of CEA facilities (see chapter  15)

for which numerous projects are significantly behind

schedule owing to changes in strategy.

During the course of 2015, the ASN commission called

the CEA Chairman to a hearing concerning:

CEA’s post-operational clean-out, decommissioning

and waste management strategy (see chapter 15);

the future of the Saclay centre;

the Jules Horowitz and Astrid reactor projects (see

point 1.2.2).

1.1.1 Experience feedback from the Fukushima

Daiichi accident

Further to the FukushimaDaiichi accident, ASNundertook

stress tests of nuclear facilities. The approach consists in

assessing the safetymargins in the facilities with regard to

the loss of electrical power, or cooling, and with regard

to extreme natural hazards.

In May 2011, ASN instructed CEA to carry out stress

tests on the BNIs with the highest risks in the light

of the Fukushima Daiichi accident (batch 1). For the

highest-priority experimental reactors, and in the light

of the conclusions of the stress tests, in June 2012 ASN

prescribed the installation of “hardened safety cores” of

organisational and material provisions.

The stress tests approach continued for a second group

(batch 2) of 22 lower-priority facilities. These includeCEA’s

research facilities such as Chicade, LECA, MCMF, Cabri,

Orphee, Atalante, as well as the emergencymanagement

resources on the Cadarache andMarcoule sites. CEA only

identified the need to define a “hardened safety core” for

Orphée, which was prescribed by ASN.

T

his chapter

presents ASN’s assessment of the safety of civil research and

industrial BNIs. These facilities are different from the BNIs involved directly

in the generation of electricity (reactors and fuel cycle facilities). These BNIs

are operated by the Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission

(CEA), by other research organisations (for example the Laue-Langevin

Institute (ILL), the ITER international organisation and the Ganil) or by industrial firms

(for instance CIS bio international, Synergy Health and Ionisos, which operate facilities

producing radiopharmaceuticals, or industrial irradiators).

These activities, which range from fundamental research to applied developments, started

in the late 1940’s in France. They support medical and industrial activities, more specifically

the fuel cycle, nuclear power generation, reprocessing and waste disposal. The variety of the

activities covered and their past history explains the wide diversity of facilities concerned.

The safety principles applied to these facilities are identical to those adopted for power

reactors and nuclear fuel cycle facilities, while taking account of their specificities with

regard to risks and drawbacks. In order to reinforce how these risks and drawbacks are

dealt with, ASN defined three categories for the facilities it regulates in its resolution of

29th September 2015 (see chapter 3).

436

CHAPTER 14:

NUCLEAR RESEARCH AND MISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015