Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  494 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 494 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

In July 2015 an incident occurred during an operation

preceding themelting process. ASNnoted that the licensee

rapidly implemented the safety procedures. ASN asked

the licensee to conduct an in-depth safety analysis of

this event and to increase its vigilance during melting

operations.

In 2015 the licensee made a new application for gradual

extension of the treatment capacities of the “Centraco 3”

BNI 160 (increase in the annual tonnage of very low-

level liquid waste and occasional treatment of tritiated

waste, and in particular Isotopchimorphanwaste). This

application is currently being reviewed by ASN.

1.5 The radioactive waste

management strategies

of the nuclear licensees

ASN requires that licensees define a management strategy

for all the radioactive waste produced in their facilities

and periodically evaluates this strategy.

These management strategies can be based on facilities

specific to each licensee but also on facilities operated by

other licensees (Andra and Socodei), described earlier.

The waste management procedures adopted by the three

main waste producers are presented below.

1.5.1 CEA waste management

Types of waste produced by CEA

CEA operates diverse installations covering all the

activities associatedwith the nuclear cycle, ranging from

laboratories and plants involved in research on the fuel

cycle to experimental reactors.

CEA also carries out numerous decommissioning

operations.

Consequently, the types of waste produced by CEA are

varied and include more specifically:

standardwaste resulting fromoperation of the research

facilities (protective garments, filters, metal parts and

components, liquid waste, etc.);

waste resulting from legacywaste retrieval andpackaging

projects (sodium, magnesium and mercury-bearing

waste);

decommissioning waste following the final shutdown

anddecommissioning of facilities (graphitewaste, rubble,

contaminated soils, etc.).

The contamination spectrum of this waste is also varied:

presence of alpha emitters in activities relating to fuel cycle

research, beta-gamma emitters for operational waste from

the experimental reactors.

CEA has specific facilities for managing this waste

(processing, packaging and storage). It is to be noted

that some of these facilities are shared between all the

CEA centres, such as the liquid effluent treatment station

in Marcoule or the solid waste treatment station in

Cadarache.

ASN’s opinion on CEA’s waste

management strategy

ASN’s last examination of CEA’s strategy, which was

concluded in 2012, showed that waste management on

the whole had improved since the previous examination

in 1999. CEA’s organisation and the implementation

of management tools must enable it to evaluate the

movements of waste produced in the coming years

and to forecast storage and transport packaging needs.

Nevertheless, given the diversity of the projects and the

corresponding waste produced, disparities have been

observed in the quality of the results, particularly with

regard to the management of long-lived intermediate-

level solid waste and low or intermediate-level liquid

waste. Since then, CEA has provided responses to the

majority of the 34 commitments made further to the

examination of its file. These elements are currently

being examined by ASN.

The issues and implications

The two main issues for CEA with regard to radioactive

waste management are:

bringing new waste processing and storage facilities

on-line or renovating existing ones within a time frame

compatible with its commitments to shut down old

installations whose level of safety no longer complies

with current requirements;

the management of certain legacy waste retrieval and

packaging projects.

As in the preceding years, ASN notes the difficulty CEA

has in fully managing these two issues and conducting

all the associated projects at the same time. CEA has still

not defined its strategy for managing the solid radioactive

waste produced on the Saclay site following the shutdown

of the ZGDS (see BNI 72, page 498).

More particularly, the very significant increases in the

projected duration of decommissioning operations

and the quantity, non-standard nature and difficulty

in characterising certain substances or waste that

will be removed from storage or produced during the

decommissioning operations have led ASN and ASND

to jointly ask CEA to conduct an overall review in 2016

of its decommissioning and radioactive materials and

waste management strategies for the next fifteen years.

494

CHAPTER 16:

RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND CONTAMINATED SITES AND SOILS

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015