Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  499 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 499 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

This installation does not meet current storage standards

andmust stop functioning. Consequently, removal of the

spent fuel and stored waste began in January 2006.

ASNconsiders that CEAmust continue retrieval of the fuel

elements stored in the Pégase pool as rapidly as possible.

Of the 900 spent-fuel cans initially stored in the pool in

2004, at the end of May 2015 there remained 52 cans of

spent fuel not coated in araldite to be removed before the

end of 2016 and 114 araldite-coated cans of spent fuel.

Removal of the remaining fuel from storage requires the

finalising of a reprocessing process that is currently being

developed on the STAR facility.

The last periodic safety review of Pégase was in 2003.

Submission of the next Pégase periodic safety review file

is planned for November 2017.

ASN will be particularly attentive to CEA’s operations to

remove material from the Pégase pool.

ASN’s assessment of the operating safetyof Pégase is positive

on the whole, but it remains vigilant with regard to the

licensee’s commitments concerning the short- andmedium-

term future of this facility.

1.5.2 Areva waste management

ASN’s opinion on Areva’s waste management

strategy

The spent fuel reprocessing plant at La Hague produces

most of Areva’s radioactivewaste. Thewaste present on the

LaHague site comprises on the onehand thewaste resulting

fromreprocessing of the spent fuel, which generally comes

fromnuclear power plants but also fromresearch reactors,

and on the other, thewaste resulting fromoperation of the

various facilities on the site. Most of this waste remains

the property of the licensees who have their spent fuel

reprocessed (whether French or foreign).

Areva’sTricastin site alsoproduceswaste associatedwith the

upstreamactivities of the cycle, essentially contaminated

by alpha emitters.

The last wastemanagement strategy review for ArevaNC

LaHague tookplace in2005. ASNaskedAreva to submit a

filepresenting thewastemanagement strategy for the group

as a whole and its practical application on the La Hague

and Tricastin sites by mid-2016.

The issues and implications

The main issues relating to the management of waste

from the licensee Areva concern:

the safety of the storage facilities for the legacy waste

present on the La Hague site. ASN has effectively

observed recurrent delays in the retrieval of legacy

waste at La Hague (see chapter 13);

the defining of solutions for waste packaging, in

particular for legacy waste.

As concerns this second point, Article L. 542-1-3 of the

Environment Code requires that IL-LL waste produced

before 2015 be packaged no later than the end of 2030.

ASN therefore reminded Areva of the need to define

and finalise solutions for packaging this waste within

a time frame enabling the 2030 deadline to be met.

These solutions will require the prior approval of ASN

in accordance with the provisions of Article 6.7 of the

Order of 7th February 2012 (see point 1.2.2).

Within the framework of the waste retrieval and packaging

operations, Areva NC is examining packaging solutions

that necessitate the development of new processes,

particularly for the following IL-LL waste:

the sludge from the STE2 facility;

the alpha technological waste coming primarily from

the La Hague andMELOX plants, which is not suitable

for surface disposal.

For other types of IL-LL waste resulting from the

waste retrieval and packaging operations, Areva NC is

examining the possibility of adapting existing processes

(compaction, cementation, vitrification). Part of the

packaging baseline requirements are currently being

examined by ASN.

Facilities operated by Areva

The waste management strategy of Areva is based

essentially on the La Hague site. Like all the fuel cycle

installations, this site is presented in chapter 13.

Ecrin (BNI 175)

The Areva NC plant on the Malvési site transforms the

concentrates from the uranium mines into uranium

tetrafluoride. The transformation process produces liquid

effluents containing nitrated sludge loaded with natural

uranium. These effluents are settled and evaporated in

ponds. The sludge is stored in ponds and the supernatant

is evaporated in evaporation ponds.

The entire plant is subject to the Seveso threshold II

ICPE system.

Only two sludge storage ponds (B1 and B2) are subject to

the BNI system due to the presence of traces of artificial

radioisotopes from the processing of reprocessed uranium

from the Marcoule site. Ponds B1 and B2 have not been

used for the settling of liquid effluents since the B2 pond

embankment failed in 2004 (utilisation prohibited by

Prefectural Order). Once commissioned, BNI 175 situated

on the site of ponds B1 and B2 will also contain the

solid residues from the Malvési site’s ponds B5 and B6,

which will be emptied when the facility enters service.

Ponds B1 and B2 and their content will be covered with

a bituminous cover.

499

CHAPTER 16:

RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND CONTAMINATED SITES AND SOILS

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015