Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  452 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 452 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

3.2 The radio-pharmaceutical

production facility operated by

CIS bio international

CIS bio international is a key player on the French

market for radiopharmaceutical products used for both

diagnosis and therapy. Most of these radionuclides are

produced in BNI 29 (UPRA) at Saclay. This facility also

recovers used sealed sources which had been used for

radiotherapy and for industrial irradiation. By Decree

on 15th December 2008, CIS bio international was

authorised to succeed CEA as operator of BNI 29.

The reorganisation efforts made in 2015 have not yet

given tangible results, in particular for simultaneous

management of large-scale projects, operational rigour,

compliance with deadlines and monitoring operating

compliance with the requirements defined by the licensee

and the regulations. ASN still observes considerable

slippage in the deadlines for transmission of significant

event reports and in the performance of the actions

identified by the inspections. The deviations observed

during inspections and in the causes of events are

indicative of persistent shortcomings in operational

rigour, the intervention process and the assessment of the

importance of the deviations. Equipment maintenance

in particular needs to be improved.

3.3 Maintenance facilities

Two Basic Nuclear Installations, operated by Areva and

EDF, handle nuclear maintenance activities in France.

The facility of the

Société de maintenance nucléaire

(Somanu)

in Maubeuge

Authorised by the Decree of 18thOctober 1985, BNI 143,

a subsidiary of Areva, specialises in the maintenance

and appraisal of equipment coming from the primary

cooling systems of EDF reactors.

ASN considers that even if operation of the facility and the

transparency of exchanges are on the whole satisfactory,

the process to produce safety case studies is a laborious

one. The licensee must therefore reorganise in order to

better address ASN’s requests and the commitments it

has made, more specifically with respect to its periodic

safety review filed at the end of 2011 andmust reinforce

corrective measures concerning compliance with the

provisions of the Order of 7th February 2012.

The consequences of the last periodic safety

review and the stress tests on UPRA (BNI 29)

CIS bio international experienced difficulties with its submission

of the reports that would enable ASN to rule on the continued

operation of the facility or its ability to withstand extreme hazards.

At the request of ASN, it was required to supplement these

periodic safety review and stress tests reports, initially submitted

in 2008 and  2012. These additions were submitted well behind

schedule.

With regard to the periodic safety review, ASN considered that

continued operation was acceptable, provided that significant

improvements were made, more specifically with regard to

control of the fire risk and compliance with the commitments

made by the licensee. With regard to the stress tests and despite

the licensee being unable to identify any cliff-edge effects, ASN

considers that it must be able to manage emergency situations

involving extreme hazards, because the consequences of an

accident would require population protection measures. This is all

the more necessary as the facility is located in Saclay, an area that

has seen extensive urban development.

A number of works, which have been under way for several

years, are thus needed to improve the safety of the facility and

are still not completed. As a rule, the large-scale actions initiated

by CIS bio international are never completed within a reasonable

time-frame.

In 2013, ASN prescribed the main safety improvements

necessary for continued operation of the facility. In 2016, it will

prescribe the deadlines for other safety improvements, for which

CIS bio international has failed to meet its commitments and the

reinforcement of the emergency management measures in the

event of an extreme hazard. It will take appropriate enforcement

and penalty measures should they prove necessary.

Following a failure to comply with the prescriptions issued in

2013 concerning control of the fire risk, ASN applied enforcement

measures and prescribed additional compensatory measures

in  2014 and  2015. In 2015, CIS bio international decided to

contest these measures before the competent jurisdictions.

TO BE NOTED

452

CHAPTER 14:

NUCLEAR RESEARCH AND MISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015