Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  399 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 399 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

4. ASSESSMENTS

4.1 Assessments of the overall

performance of the NPPs in service

4.1.1 Nuclear safety assessment

Reactor operations

Management of reactor operations is on the whole

satisfactory. However, in 2015, a number of activities

governed by prescriptive documents, such as the

performance of periodic tests, were nonetheless the

cause of significant events. The root causes of these events

are numerous and can sometimes be cumulative. These

include inadequate preparation for activities, meaning

that the personnel concerned are not sufficiently aware

of the risks involved or of the documentation needed

to carry them out. It is also necessary to minimise the

possible interpretations of these documents and take

account of the differing levels of know-how and expertise

among the personnel concerned.

This situation is indicative of the insufficient involvement

by the head office departments in monitoring the

assimilation of the prescriptive documents by the NPPs.

It is also indicative of external Operating Experience

Feedback (OEF) management that is not yet robust

enough, both between the sites and with respect to

EDF head office departments. It in particular highlights

the need to reinforce the national OEF loop in order

to improve the documentary production process. ASN

drew the attention of the licensee to these weak points.

EDF’s in-house Independent Safety Organisation (FIS)

plays its role of verifying the actions and decisions

taken by the departments in charge of operating the

installations. However, there is a need for improved

traceability of the points justifying the need for these

verifications and of the resulting positions adopted.

The inspections carried out by ASN on the FIS in 2013

and 2014 led EDF to propose an action plan, currently

being evaluated by ASN.

With regard to the periodic tests and despite the

improvements observed on the sites compared to

2014, efforts are still needed with regard to the

scheduling, preparation and performance of these tests.

Furthermore, both the prior analysis of the operation

and the interpretation of the results obtained need to be

strengthened. The process used for a subsequent ruling

on the validity of the tests also needs to be reinforced

in order to promote a questioning attitude.

ASN inspection on the topic of water intake and measurement of samples of effluents discharged from the Flamanville NPP, November 2011.

399

CHAPTER 12:

EDF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (NPPs)

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015