Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  443 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 443 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

Jules Horowitz Reactor.

Jules Horowitz Reactor, risks and

prevention systems

Just like all reactors, the RJH presents four main risks:

• Core melt:

resulting from overheating of the irradiated

fuel. To prevent this, the core is cooled by a closed circuit

of circulating water (primary system), itself cooled by a

secondary system. Finally, the water from the Provence

canal, which is then directed to the EDF canal, cools this latter

(tertiary system). At the same time, the reactor (the core and

part of the primary system) is immersed in the water-filled

reactor cavity.

• Criticality:

runaway fission reaction of the uranium atoms

contained in the reactor core (fuel). To prevent this, a specific

fuel elements geometry must be maintained. To do this,

and over and above the numerous retaining systems in the

reactor, protection is provided by the “reactor building”

(pre-stressed concrete).

• Dispersal of radioactivity:

in an accident situation,

radioactivity can be dispersed in liquid, gaseous or dust form.

Three barriers are designed to prevent this:

-- 1st barrier: the fuel cladding: which will prevent the fuel

from coming into contact with the water in the primary

system;

-- 2nd barrier: the primary system: if the 1st barrier fails, the

primary system will contain the radioactivity dispersed into

the water;

-- 3rd barrier: the containment: if the 2nd barrier fails,

the pre-stressed concrete reactor building acts as the

containment for the radioactive substances.

• Irradiation:

emission of particles that are harmful

to the organism. To prevent this, screens can be installed,

or materials such as water, concrete, etc. can be used.

The water in the reactor cavity for example also acts

a protective shield. Steps are also presented to deal with

UNDERSTAND

hazards that can stem from the installation itself or even from its

environment: extreme climatic conditions, flooding, earthquake,

airplane crash, internal fire or explosion, projectile or falling load

inside the installation. Seismic pads are for instance present

underneath the installation

In addition, the assessments carried out following the Fukushima

Daiichi accident led CEA to identify a «hardened safety core» of

equipment, the operation of which must be guaranteed in extreme

situations.

This equipment must enable the following to take place:

• cooling of the core to prevent an accident: equipment designed to

maintain convection in the primary system and pool make-up system

from outside the facility;

• in the event of an accident, limit discharges into the environment:

equipment designed to isolate and depressurise the containment,

radiological activity and pressure sensors;

• in the event of an accident, monitor the facility and manage the

emergency: in the fall-back centre, indicators of the temperature

and water level in the reactor cavity and of maintained convection in

the primary system, with installation of mobile resources (portable

lighting, radiation protection monitors, communication devices, etc.).

In order to obtain commissioning authorisation for the RJH, CEA shall

demonstrate that the steps it has taken can guarantee the operational

safety of the reactor and meet the ASN demands and prescriptions

issued at the time of the creation of the facility.

443

CHAPTER 14:

NUCLEAR RESEARCH AND MISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2015